A Paragraph of Da Mu Hsing I & II
I have heard the phrases "think of it like a sentence" to describe vocabulary of motion, flow, and personal interpretation of a technique, and I have always wanted to actually write it out, to figure out what sort of punctuation I use when doing my forms. So I'm finally getting around to doing it with my hand form for this year.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Da Mu Hsing I and II
Opening bow,
(winD-UP)High rising block! step forward punch, step back downward foot-block, punch. Retract --(look) inside hooking block? Step forward punch, (look) reverse hooking block, VERTICAL PUNCH, (look) outside forearm block, (look) knife-hand.
Take down the guards strike (I'm realizing I don't actually know what this technique is called?) (look) double block; winD-UPknifehandlongpunch openroundhouse(look)spinningbackkick crane stance retraction.
Lower double knife-hand block. Front thrust KICK, lower slide out PUNCH. Pivot downward foot block! inside hooking block. release twist PUNCH! VERTICAL PUNCH!
Halfway closing bow,
Closing Bow.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Notes:
- I wrote the inside hooking block with a "?" because I am trying to check my high back stance and make sure this technique is completed because I find it really easy to rush through it, it invokes the same intonation in my brain as a "?" does when I'm reading, not the sound, but the feeling.
- I'm thinking about the idea of how English is a horrible medium for describing Kung fu, Multiple times when I wrote a section I was grasping for a punctuation in between a "." and a "," something I could use to explain the finality/release/completion of a single technique while also continuing the momentum of the techniques around it. (I suppose I could write it as a (punctuation) with a lowercase on the next sentence like I did in-between the first and second technique, or as ".," but it felt redundant since every technique should have an ending, but I'm still struggling how to articulate this idea.
- I realize reading it back that for many of these I included the movement/preliminary actions, and I think I accidentally did this as a way to mimic the rhythm in my head, and the "beginning, middle, end" that exists within each technique. Because I don't just think "punch. block. strike." I am trying to use words to string together the motions that exist in-between so as to better replicate the form. I wish I knew how to read/write music because that may be a much better way to articulate the patterns of my flow than English and could solve my problem I just described!
- I found it interesting that we refer to it as the "opening" and "closing" bow even though they are the same motions. I'm wondering if the difference in name refers to the difference in intent, because I do think about two very different things in my opening compared to my closing, but they have many similarities like being strong/intense, being a reset point, etc. but just in different contexts? I'm not sure, but I never thought about this until I wrote them out and thought about the difference in name compared to the similarity in movement.
Interpretations of forms is something I am quite fond of, and I really like the perspective in this post.
ReplyDeleteAs for your last bullet point (regarding opening / closing bows), in my personal opinion, I believe you are accurate in your statement regarding intent. A metaphor I have thought of in the past is likening a form to driving a vehicle. The opening bow is turning the key to start the vehicle before the start of the drive, and the closing bow is turning the key to turn the vehicle off at the end of the drive. Near identical motions, yet opposite sides of a coin when considering what they accomplish and represent. Both are remarkably important, mind you.
Something I have focused a lot on this last year is personalization; while my approach has been different, comparing forms to reading sentences is another analogy I like to consider. Just as emphasis and pronunciation can affect how your sentence is interpreted, I believe it affects forms in the same way.
Once again, awesome post!
Love this post. Yes, the opening and the closing are determined by intent. There are so many layers to a form or a technique and the fun in training is discovering the layers. Those discoveries are what propel you to mastery. So while they are determined by intent, there is more layers than within the layers. There is more intent within the intent.
ReplyDelete